Editor's note: This article is part of a series that reviews Utah and United States history for the history section of KSL.com.
SALT LAKE CITY – Growth is an issue that has been on the minds of Utah leaders for some time. Ask anyone who oversees planning in the state and they will probably tell you that the highest priority is finding ways to manage it sustainably.
This problem is no different than a growth problem that came up at the University of Utah 75 years ago this year. Front page headlines warned of a growing student enrollment "crisis" after World War I. The crisis became so severe that the president of the university at the time even admitted that they would have to consider moving the school from where it was founded.
Bim Oliver, historian and architect, considers it the most pivotal moment in the university's 171-year history.
"If certain things had not happened, and certain things had not happened during this period, it is very possible that the University of Utah would not exist as we know it today," he said.
Oliver spoke about his research on the subject during an online event hosted by the Utah State Historic Preservation Office on Wednesday.
Here's how the university ended up facing a major enrollment dilemma 75 years ago, and how officials were able to keep the school afloat and help it thrive to become the institution that it is. today.
South of Enrollment and the Land Dilemma
While the University of Utah was founded in 1850, its "first real campus" grew out of 60 acres of land acquired from Fort Douglas in the 1890s, Oliver explained.
"Up until that point, it had been kind of a roving institution, moving through various locations downtown," he said, adding that the state Legislature approved plans to build new structures on the site in 1896 when enrollment was about 200 students.
The buildings that make up the campus Presidents Circle, such as the Alfred Emery Building and the Park Building, were constructed in the decades following that acquisition.
Then, in 1948, Fort Douglas transferred about 300 acres that had more than 100 buildings to the University. Dwight D. Eisenhower, who would become President of the United States soon after, even had a role in getting the land transfer done.
"This was really the critical piece in all of this," Oliver said. . "It's not the 700 to 800 acres that President Olpin was dreaming of, but it's enough to get the university where it needs to go in a very short time … It basically tripled the land area of the university."
Other buildings were also brought in from different areas of the state, including a former Camp Kearns building that became the university bookstore in 1949. The university also made good use of the buildings it received from Fort Douglas. For example, the school converted a former Army barracks into a radiological technology laboratory.
One facility, called The Annex, became the most versatile because it expanded the university's stock of buildings by 30% on its own. The 90,000-square-foot building was used for all kinds of classes and academic department offices; Oliver said it once even housed the world's largest turtle collection.
At the same time, the new space created a new problem. The expanded campus essentially became two campuses, with buildings a mile apart. And since there were so many new students, campus administrators tried to make sure class schedules were tight.
That meant more students had to drive to one side of campus or the other if they wanted to get to the next class on time.
"As time went on … one of the main problems for campus planners was traffic. People didn't want to go up the hill, so they got into their car," Oliver said. "You now have a traffic jam and there is no parking to accommodate it."
So new roads were paved to address the traffic problems, but it's also a problem that was never fully resolved, Oliver said.
Still, the land ended up being the most important item. The university gradually moved from buildings constructed during World War II to newer and larger buildings on campus. More than 75 buildings were constructed from the 1950s to the 1970s on land acquired in the land transfer, including the Jon Huntsman Center.
The university also acquired more land over time as it expanded. The Utah System of Higher Education listed total college enrollment at just over 32,000 during the 2020-21 school year.
None of this could have been achieved without decision-making in the 1940s.
The End of an Era and the Lessons It Taught
About half a dozen buildings remain from the 1948 land transfer, but the number is shrinking. The annex is scheduled to be demolished later this year. Oliver regretted that decision because the building quietly played such an important role during a pivotal moment in the university's history.
Other attendees at Wednesday's event gave testimony of the building's history. Julie Myers said that her parents attended college in the 1950s, and her father joked "he didn't graduate from the University of Utah, he graduated from The Annex."
"I'm also sad to see The Annex go," he said.
However, the history of the 1940s is not entirely different from the situations emerging today on the Wasatch Front as Utah's population expands. The decisions made by the university 75 years ago are essentially the decisions that Utah government leaders and planners are working on today.
Vineyard's population boom is the result of land that was once owned by the Geneva Steel Mill and planning is already underway for what will happen to the land at the Utah State Prison in Draper once a new prison opens. in Salt Lake City next year. They both share similar stories about how the University of Utah found land to expand.
Meanwhile, there are countless examples of companies and governments rehabilitating old buildings and turning them into something new, just as the university did after its crisis began 75 years ago.
"I think the real theme here that comes out of this narrative is how remarkably resourceful, creative and innovative university administrators, planners and workers were in adapting these buildings to their uses as university buildings," Oliver said. "They were totally and completely unsuitable for those purposes, and yet the university was able to get by with these buildings."
Be First to Comment